Reply to White folks, is Tim Walz a "unicorn"? (non-political)

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "White folks, is Tim Walz a "unicorn"? (non-political)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]This might be the most telling thread on DCUM of the 2024 election, starting with the original post, which I assume is from a plant trying to generate earned media. It starts with the strawman that white men are "in trouble" and Tim Walz is "special", implying that he's the odd non-problematic white man who doesn't live in an elite city / suburb. It then devolves into pablum praising him as being "the unusual sensitive guy from the Midwest" or some drivel like that or conservative trolls trashing him for either his lack of masculinity or fake hunting PR stunts. The reality is that Tim Walz is a politician who has cooperated with the DNC to finally get his ticket punched; he did what he was told. He has few real beliefs, like most politicians, and he showed during this cycle that he can't think on his feet; he's not very smart. He was a lousy pick, chosen for football coach vibes and because Josh Shapiro "would have lost the party Dearborn, Michigan" (if you can't decode that, bless your heart.) He was a lousy VP on a lousy ticket. Democrats need to stop looking for "unicorns" and start running the smartest and most articulate / dynamic candidates. More Bill Clinton / Obama, less Tim Walz.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics