Reply to Angela Alsobrooks Unlawfully Claims Tax Deductions

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Angela Alsobrooks Unlawfully Claims Tax Deductions "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This seems reasonable, except she made at least FOUR different illegal "mistakes" that saved her a lot more money than it cost her. Funny, she is in charge of PG county tax collection. how does she not know the law? does she not do her job or is she hiding something (or both??!)[/quote]

Its something when the average poster on here is both more diligent and competent than a possible Senator.[/quote]

Tons of people make mistakes on the taxes. Do you live in the US? Our tax system sucks.[/quote]

A county executive who is in charge of tax collections not knowing how to do her local taxes is a little different than a machinist or hair dresser making the same mistake. These things should be in her core competency, and she made at least four "mistakes."

Democrats really should have picked someone else. [/quote]

Had we known about the Tax fraud issues, we probably would have chosen a better candidate but it's too late in the game to play Monday morning QB and at the end of the day, it's all about preventing the GOP from gaining that Senate seat.[/quote]

I’d prefer a candidate who pays their state taxes correctly. I’m not a blind voter like you, PP. Angela would have received a notice in the mail every year that she received the senior tax credit so she’s lying about her ignorance. That’s how property tax credits work. All through the mail and the courthouse.[/quote]

I'd prefer Hogan any day in a Maryland governor's race. Relative to the low bar set by other state governors in modern times, he was a solid executive and fair leader. In a US Senate race during the Trump era, I have to choose the Dem candidate since balance of power in the Senate and therefore in our Federal Government is at stake. Alsobrooks could be a George Santos and from what i am hearing, may be a George Santos, but I'd still vote for her in this case. [/quote]

And this is the logical conclusion of "Blue no matter Who." This is how we end up with a government full of partisan dunces. [/quote]

Then you can blame the GOP who elect partisan dunces like Tuberville, the idiotic football coach who thinks that wasting taxpayer money, and denying hard serving military officers their promotions and leaving our military branches without their commanders, is an effective way to protest.  Blame the GOP who think that Kennedy of Louisiana is some sort of bright bulb.  Blame the GOP who elected JD Vance, who his showing that a Yale degree does not guarantee intelligence and that it is possible for adult males near their prime to lose IQ points every time they talk.  With the GOP electing so many hard-liners who vote en masse, then the Democratic states need to vote for bulwark senators to hold the line against those who are ultimate partisans.  The GOP started hard-lining back in the days of Newt Gingrich and the rise of the Tea Party.  They were the first to elect out their moderates who were the conciliators and concession makers.   After this, the blue dog Democrats were elected out and now we have very few moderates left to craft bipartisan agreements across the aisle.[/quote]

If your argument is "we have to elect partisan dunces to counteract the other-side's partisan dunces" then you don't really have a viable democracy anymore. Might as well just find an under-employed Habsburg and save everyone the stress. [/quote]

Dp. I don't think that's what PP is saying. Another PP above (you?) asserts that voting for Alsobrooks constitutes voting for a "partisan dunce". I think PP points out that the real "dunces" are on the right. Look, I wasn't a fan of Paul Ryan or John McCain but they weren't dunces. The current GOP only allows dunces.

Alsobrooks is not a "dunce" by any stretch, only someone who doesn't know anything about her beyond her tax errors would say that. Do you live remotely near Prince George's County or are you the person who thinks it's a 40,000 person "town"?[/quote]

She probably isn't a dunce and I'd rather see a Dem take this Senate seat but the fact that she made the jump to the national political stage without first cleaning up her tax misrepresentation mess first doesn't speak volumes for her or her campaign's general wherewithal. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics