Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The public opinion and even the police opinion is driven by the media unfortunately. People wanted to take the words of Amber very seriously as if she’s some moral paragon of virtue. She saw no problem with being a mistress to a married man with a pregnant wife at home[/quote] I see no reason to drag Amber through the mud. She didn't know she was a mistress. She thought he was her boyfriend. He told her that he lost his wife and this would be the first Christmas without her, and that was before she was dead. And when she did know who he was because of all the media coverage, she went to the police and the audio recordings she helped to facilitate are likely a large part of why he is in prison today.[/quote] Ahh so you trust a police patsy? Amber was a poor massage therapist and surely made a killing (no pun intended) from this charade. I don’t trust her farther than I can spit. I’m not saying Scott is Husband of the Year. He isn’t but the entire trial weighed on the testimony of Amber Frey. I never liked or trusted Amber or thought she was being honest. I also always believed Scott was innocent. It makes no sense why he wouldn’t confess after all these years since he was sentenced to life anyway. I don’t think he was a sociopath who would dismember and behead his wife and wrap twine around his sons neck without leaving a trace. [b]I think Laci was being nosy and walked in to the confront the house robbers across the street and they kidnapped her.[/b][/quote] You think an 8 month pregnant woman is going to investigate a possible crime alone? She could walk back home and call the police?[/quote] Yes. Laci’s personality was very forward and talkative according to family. Originally, Lacis family believed Scott was innocent and the robbers did it. The first couple of weeks they were upset at Nancy Grace and others for pointing the finger at Scott. After Amber Frey came forward, Lacis family were convinced Scott killed Laci. [/quote] This. If he turns out to be innocent, there’s a special place in hell for Sharon Rocha. [/quote] An innocent man would not tell his mostess that his wife is dead or bleach his hair and flee to Mexico. I know, I know, maybe he just wanted to fish in Mexico, and he always wanted to try blond hair. Scott is where he belongs.[/quote] Running away and dying his hair was to avoid paparazzi, the mobs swarming his house, and jail. It has nothing to do with guilt. This country is insane when it comes to media brainwashing[/quote] Scott’s own words and lies damned him. No conspiracy theory podcaster can change that. [/quote] Words and lies are not forensic dna evidence. What does the DA have to hide? Why not test the van? If they’re so sure Scott did it, then testing it should not be a big deal, right?[/quote] An innocent man doesn’t need to lie. I don’t really give a rat’s ass if they do the testing or not. Scott is locked up where he belongs. No tears will be shed for him [/quote] Many men lie. Do you think if Hillary Clinton vanished in 1998 that Bill Clinton was the suspect? Lots of the population lie. Lots of the population cheat. Very few of the population are sick enough to decapitate a loved one and they’re unborn. Laci and Scott were married and he married young in his 20’s. He didn’t need to marry Laci and they were married for five years without kids. He could’ve divorced her at any time. He wanted kids with her that year and they both chose the baby name months in advance. He was at every sonography Appt. He had just met Amber in November 2003 and it wasn’t his first affair in the marriage either. What exactly was so special about Amber that he wanted to see her? He wasn’t even trying to see her during Christmas Eve. There was zero evidence he wanted to kill Laci and his son just to “be with Amber”. He already was with Amber so what exactly did he need to kill Laci or his son for? The motive doesn’t add up and Scot being a liar and cheater and telling Amber he doesn’t have a wife anymore is sad and messed up but what do you think married men till the other women? They’re in love with their wives and won’t ever leave them? He was trying to get in her pants. He’s admitted he regrets every day that he cheated on Laci and being a f’d up cheater and liar but Amber was not his first affair. He was cheating on Laci since before the marriage. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics