Reply to Divisionals really shows why the unfair birthday rule matters

Forum Index » Swimming and Diving

Reply to "Divisionals really shows why the unfair birthday rule matters "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And to add to my above scenario. what do you do to a relay if a swimmer ages up, in the now 2 weeks, between Relay Carnival and All Star relays? Kick them off the relay because they are now 11 or 13?

For so many reasons setting an age on a certain date for a short 7 week season absolutely makes sense. [/quote]

One substitution is allowed.[/quote]

so you are cool with kicking a kid off a relay because they aged up in between meets and never giving hem a change because the league also doesn't allow kids to swim up on a relay carnival relay.

what about my above with all stars? We remove kid from the all star meet if a kid has a fast time and aged up during the week between divisionals and all stars? [/quote]

Sounds like another good reason to get rid of relay all stars and award medals based on the fastest relays from the 17 relay carnivals.[/quote]

All so a kid, or rather, a parent with a May birthday kid can longer cry "how unfair". sounds logical. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics