Reply to 198 Democrats Voted Against the SAVE Act

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "198 Democrats Voted Against the SAVE Act"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is a redundant law that accomplishes nothing new.

Non-citizens are already prohibited from voting by numerous laws and statutes, for example:

[b]18 U.S. Code § 611:[/b] [b]This federal law explicitly prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections[/b], stating: "It shall be unlawful for any alien to vote in any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing a candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, unless (1) the election is held partly for some other purpose; (2) aliens are authorized to vote for such other purpose under a State constitution or statute or a local ordinance; and (3) voting for such other purpose is conducted independently of voting for one of the offices referred to in this subsection."

[b]National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA):[/b] This act requires that states provide voter registration forms that include [b]an affirmation that the registrant is a U.S. citizen.[/b]

[b]Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA):[/b] This law mandates that first-time voters who register by mail provide identification to [b]verify their identity and citizenship.[/b]

Also, the Constitution effectively limits voting to citizens.

This bill is redundant, accomplishes nothing new, wasted time and money, and was nothing but performative theater by the Republicans for no good reason other than to feed into their BS narrative that illegal aliens are "replacing" Americans at the polls and everywhere else.  These false Republican claims have repeatedly been debunked and disproven. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/may/20/mike-johnson/mike-johnsons-false-claim-that-immigrants-paroled/[/quote]

This is the fact.[/quote]

"National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA):[/b] This act requires that states provide voter registration forms that include [b]an affirmation that the registrant is a U.S. citizen."

And, in some states, the only affirmation that is required is the registrant checks a box.  That's it.  
So, yes - this law is needed.

We have upward of 20 million people in our country illegally.  If only 1% of them voted in a federal election, that would be 200,000 illegal votes.  Enough to change the outcome of races depending upon where these people reside.  [/quote]

The claims that there are any substantial amounts of illegals voting have been repeatedly debunked, and where they did try to vote, [b]they were caught.[/b]  The laws are sufficient and the system works.[/quote]

How do we know that?  Sure, some were caught.  But, were there more?  And, might there be more widespread voter fraud in the future?
And "substantial amounts (numbers, actually)" is what exactly?  How many is "substantial?"
In my opinion "substantial" is exactly one.  Not too long ago a race in VA was decided by a coin flip because it ended up tied.  One vote makes a difference.  [/quote]

What do you mean "more" widespread voter fraud in the future?  There wasn't widespread voter fraud in the first place, for there to then subsequently be "more" of.  #StopTheSteal was nothing but a desperate, deranged conspiracy theory.[/quote]

There is widespread voter fraud. When you’re at the DMV, you can register to vote . They don’t ask if you’re a citizen . Sanctuary states allow illegals to get drivers license and register them to vote as well  . It’s super easy to register to vote. One can even do so online [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics