Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Guest lecturer perspective: modern students are absolutely atrocious"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It sounds like your lecture sucks honestly. [/quote] Nope, it's the same but with updated info. I actually got feedback directly from the students - overwhelmingly positive every single time. The material is fine. Why could students in 2010 pay attention and listen while kids in 2024 have the attention spans of ants? [/quote] I agree with the pp here. [b]Going off 13yo data is not wise. Nothing ages that well. [/b] Honestly, I have trouble listening through most lectures. I don't think that I've changed for the worse since 2010. I'm not going to appear rapt, but I get what's important. [/quote] This is how we ended up with Lucy Calkins and “new math”, everybody.[/quote] Uh, presumably this is qualitative data moron. [/quote] Also, I question OP's methods of data collection. People may have lied, or given half truths. [/quote] DP: There are dozens of disciplines that use qualitative research methods and they have also sorts of established methods for addressing these concerns. People can lie on surveys even easier. When you have long interviews, multiple observations, artifact analysis it's much easier to track inconsistencies in evidence and note them and follow up and find out. No idea whether original article is solid or not as I haven't read it, but sample size is not the way you judge. If it's in a decent scholarly journal peer reviewers and editorial board will have assessed the methods. If it's in a crap journal the findings would be less likely to taken seriously.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics