Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Supreme Court Texas Immigration Ruling"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]KJP will not state that these migrants were deported.... because they weren't. They were "apprehended," which is Biden-speak for "they turned themselves over to border patrol, were processed, and released into the country." [twitter]https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1771259255737188635[/twitter] Full first post: DOOCY: “Were they deported?” KJP: “What — they were apprehended. I can't speak to individual — individual cases. That's not something I can do from here, but they were all apprehended. That's number one. And it — the reason why you're talking about the Texas National Guard — they were there because of the governor of Texas. The governor of Texas put the Texas National Guard there. We didn't put them there. He put them there. What we need is actually real solutions. We need to see resources. The Border Patrol agents deserve resources. They deserve to be able to do their jobs and we're not getting that from Republicans. They're rejecting a bipartisan agreement that came out of the Senate.” Full second post: DOOCY: “And, last one. There is a Venezuelan migrant with half a million followers on TikTok, who's telling border crossers they can live in empty houses in this country. Would President Biden support a law that would make that kind of squatting illegal?” KJP: “I did — have not seen that TikTok video, so I can't comment on that.” [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics