Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "If women could go back in time"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As a SAHM, I would love it if most women were still SAHMs. There would be more people around and we could do more things during the day like PTO, book clubs, lunches, etc. Also there wouldn't be this pressure to "go back to work" when the kids are older the way there is now. I've managed to work just very part time at a school, but I feel like there is this expectation that because my kids are older I should be back at work. Also, if most families only had one income, there would be less of a competitive "arms race" so to speak on buying kids stuff and experiences. Housing and other prices wouldn't have been driven so high either. But mostly I would just love it if I were EXPECTED to stay at home, rather than bucking some trend. [/quote] I get what you are saying. I think the problem now is that you are kind of considered a loser if you “only” aspire to take care of your family, home, etc. And now if you do that without marrying a male 1%er, you are putting your family at a distinct disadvantage financially relative to all the dual-earning families. At the same time, do I want to revert to not being able to own property, etc? NO. I also don’t want to be treated as though I’m a smaller less hairy man. I’m not a man! I have different fundamental desires/drives, and one of them is to be the primary caretaker of my kids. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics