Reply to Realistically what can we do about guns when we have 430 million in the US

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Realistically what can we do about guns when we have 430 million in the US"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In my opinion as someone who fought in a war, the AR-15 is not a weapon of war. [/quote]
Honest question: why is that?  The AR-15 is basically an M-16 with the full auto disabled, and the M-16 was the primary battlefield firearm for the U.S. armed forces for many, many years.[/quote]You've basically got it. But that's a big difference.  Also, aside from the side-arm, the [b]M-16 is the weakest "weapon of war" in the US arsenal[/b].  Calling an AR-15 a weapon of war is like calling a Honda Civic a race car.[/quote]

Such a stupid statement. Why would the department of defense specifically choose a weak weapon for soldiers.

You are a liar [/quote]

Older weapons by DOD were more powerful per shot. Bigger bullet, more gunpowder, bigger range. It also penetration more. This mean that cover can be shot into.

They went to lighter weapon which carry more bullet at the time where military doctrine was to mass fire into jungle insteadf of precision firing of the bullet. They did no need the further range of the 7.62 when engagement was so close.

Need right tool for job time.

This previous person no lie, but you lack education of the subject matter expertise.

Let's study![/quote]

Too bad you didn’t study grammar as much as you studied tools for murdering people. Had to read your NRA nonsense three times to discern what you meant. What do you do for a living with such awful communication skills?[/quote]So you agree with PP.  Good.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics