Reply to Field hockey clubs feedback

Forum Index » Sports General Discussion

Reply to "Field hockey clubs feedback "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NP.  Current Wolves parent in the upper age group.  I read this post fully and IMO there are truths to both the positive and critical posts about the Wolves.  I can easily name what a PP poster called who the core players are versus the sidelined players are in the upper age group.  IMO here are the top three positives and negatives about the Wolves.

Positives:  1) Excellent u12/u14 coaches that have been brought in 2) Superb goalie coaches 3) Strong recruiting advise
Negatives: 1) Inconsistent and/or ineffective (different learning styles) coaching for older age group during practices/tournaments 2) Limited skill development for less skilled upper aged players due to limited playing opportunities and skill practice differentiation 3) Coaching philosophy stated versus executed are a mismatch sometimes

Possible areas to improve:  1) Skills differentiation and playing opportunities for highly skilled players versus developing players 2) Effective practice time focusing on skills (repetition), strategy (field IQ, watching games for movement and positioning) 3) Strength and conditioning integration

I agree with other posters there isn’t a perfect club out there.  Everywhere has their positives and negatives.  Do your homework before deciding on a club.  [/quote]

Current Wolves parent.  My main beef with this club is that some of the core players are not necessarily better than the sidelined players.  This is what is frustrating to me.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics