Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Reply to "APS DHMS walk zone nuclear option"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why don’t they just let the Hamm walk zone stay at Hamm and bus everyone else to Williamsburg? Wouldn’t this keep everyone happy? [/quote]Yes. And it's consistent with APS diversity goals. [/quote] I don’t see how recreating the Rosslyn Island to Williamsburg is fine but moving immersion to Williamsburg is a nonstarter. It’s the exact same issues. [/quote] No, it's not. Immersion is a countywide program and you need to get students to Williamsburg from all over the County. Rosslyn island to Williamsburg is just a few buses of kids from the NE quadrant to the NW quadrant. Also, those Rosslyn students would be assigned to WMS; whereas immersion students have to choose to continue in the program and many have a far more convenient default and therefore more likely to opt-out....defeating the purpose (alleviating crowding in south Arlington) of moving the program.[/quote] Immersion runs busses all over the county no matter where it’s located. Also, why should we care that immersion students have to choose between an inconvenient special program and a more convenient neighborhood option? It’s optional! We should be prioritizing the default. It’s not like Gunston is convenient for people who live near Rosslyn and Courthouse but according to the map they still attend. Williamsburg is projected to be at 65% in a few years. We could just move immersion there and be done without adding bus runs for walk zone kids or creating islands. [/quote] OK. Go ahead with that plan and see how it works. I'll put my money down on "it isn't going to play out the way you think it will."[/quote] Yes, we already heard this. “Moving Key will kill the school. Families won’t be willing to travel to a new location.” And yet. 92% of the students moved to the new location. Of the 49 that didn’t, 20 moved out of the county entirely. If the program is truly strong and valuable, people will follow it. [/quote] It’s not just about current families moving to a new location. It’s about needing native Spanish speakers for the model to work moving forward. Been to Williamsburg lately? How do you think that will work out? For those of you rabid to put a stop to any change, this idea isn’t it.[/quote] If Spanish speakers don’t want to enroll their children in Immersion, moving to closer won’t work either. I have heard exactly 0 parents IRL say the reason they don’t want Immersion is location. And even telling them that their children’s outcomes will be better isn’t doing the trick. Maybe they don’t want the program? And it’s a bit patronizing to try to make them want it because it’s for their own good. Option programs need to go where there is space and that’s that. The rest of the county shouldn’t be shuffled around and disrupted for an OPTIONAL program. [/quote] APS is not going to run option programs in a way in which they are likely to fail because you don’t want your kid to take a bus. You don’t think there’s a whole contingent of people that will surface to speak up against that if APS staff is dumb enough to suggest it? Some of these arguments are just such a waste of time. It’s like toddlers tantruming. [/quote] If moving a program across a 5 mile wide county is its demise, it never had strong support. It just makes sense to put option schools where we have capacity — that’s how they actually got started back in 70s when APS had empty schools and thought of using them for options. [b]The only contingent to speak up will the white parents in immersion using the program to avoid their neighborhood schools [/b]— they wanted a convenient “better” school rather than actual commitment to immersion. Calling people “toddlers” — I see you ad hominem attack. [/quote] Why is your complaint any more valid than their complaints in this situation?[/quote] APS is a neighborhood based school boundary system. Your comment doesn't even make sense.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics