Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Ron DeSantis ends permanent alimony "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NP. I think the rapid fire posts lashing out at anyone who is opposed to permanent alimony come across as deeply entitled and sexist. These are the same people who think it is horrifying if a woman in her 70s and 80s has to work, but are gleeful about how making the elderly ex-husband continue to work into his 80s to support that permanent alimony is fine, great even. It is greedy and hypocritical. [/quote] Yet the divorce decree states that reality and the judge signed off on it, and the woman gave up marital assets for the alimony. That’s not greedy. That’s buyers remorse on the husband’s side.[/quote] Why should the elderly husband be the only one who suffers for buyer’s remorse? It is immoral for these ex-wives to force elderly men to keep working when they refuse to do the same. If both parties are working, then I think the situation is different. But forcing an elderly man to keep working into his 80s so you don’t have to sully yourself with a job? That is flat-out immoral and horribly greedy. [/quote] The women who received alimony had a cap on how much they could make each year. The paying husbands didn’t. So in addition to earning less and giving up assets, now the women must give up their alimony. The divorce settlements were not immoral. They had to adhere to legal guidelines or else the judge wouldn’t have signed off on them. [/quote] And now those legal guidelines have changed so divorce negotiations will change too going forward. The gravy train for lazy women has just stopped.[/quote] The women will receive larger property asset divisions when they negotiate their divorce settlements. Everything acquired during marriage belongs to both parties. Now, if the husband wants certain assets, the wife will not agree to give them to the husband outright and accept alimony over a period of years. They will have to be bought out of said assets at the time the divorce takes place. Also, women can still get alimony if they work. The court will equalize the amount a woman receives according to their wages. A spouse making $150,000 a year vs a spouse making $45,000 a year- the spouse making less will receive alimony. Just because someone receives alimony, doesn’t mean that they don’t work. The court recognizes that one spouse may have worked a less demanding and less lucrative job to contribute to household upkeep and childcare duties. It’s not simply one spouse didn’t work and demanded lifelong alimony. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics