Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Kevin Costner divorce"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]$400m and she gets a $1m property settlement (.25%) is spite. It’s a terrible offer to a woman you’ve been with for 25 years and had 3 children with. Much of his estate was built over the course of their married life. A reasonable, non evil person would’ve quietly given her a minimum of $10m (still less than 5%) and avoided all the negative publicity. [/quote] She deserves what she agreed to in the prenup. A reasonable person honors that agreement and doesn’t ask for more.[/quote] PP didn't use the word "deserve". The point is that a man with a $400m estate should settle this matter with his partner of 25 years, mother of his 3 children, privately for a conscionable amount. $1m of $400m after an 18 year marriage and 3 kids is unconscionable. [/quote] He did. They documented it and signed it. Paying women to be mothers is a disgusting idea. She got more of his money when they were partners. He gave her the greatest gift in the world 3 children and she never had to work and probably had Nannie’s. They have the best life/education/ etc Marriage is not a profitable job the idea that women are paid to be wives and mothers is unconscionable. 19/25 amazing years. Paying her more after the divorce is terrible practice.[/quote] It’s the “Nannie’s” poster again. Has it out for women who can afford nannies. [/quote] Not against Nannie’s just pointing out she has a great life all expense paid. Sorry but you’re not a salaried employee you were a wife. Now you’re not,[/quote] You are very recognizable because of your miscapitalization and mispunctuation of that one word[/quote] And how you make every sentence a paragraph. We know you're not against nannies; you always trash MBs (Mom Bosses). [/quote] New poster, sorry to break your bubble Inspector DCUM, but iPhone has a recent (in the past year or so) auto correct that turns ‘nannies’ into Nannie’s. I only know this because I’m a nanny and have to correct it every post I ever make in life. I’m a nanny who works for families like this (Jeff can tell you that, I’m the ‘celeb nanny’ who posts here regularly) and can assure you this family likely had a team of 24/7 rota nannies. That doesn’t mean the parents aren’t involved and that this mum didn’t do anything all day, but layabout. Nannies can attest to all the sahms who micromanage all day long, so it’s pretty rare to actually meet a layabout sahm. I’m sure these nannies are also earning over 100k a year each, but they work in a team with the other nannies AND THE PARENTS. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics