Reply to SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS sided with Christian Web Designer"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is funny

[twitter]https://twitter.com/MarinaMedvin/status/1674789255368036357?t=uCeljoPimGB_YyijK6nXrQ&s=19[/twitter][/quote]

What's even funnier is that the whole case is made up. The gay couple wanting a wedding website don't exist.

[quote]The veracity of a key document in a major LGBTQ+ rights case before the US supreme court has come under question, raising the possibility that important evidence cited in it might be wrong or even falsified...

...In 2016, [Lorie Smith, the website designer] says, a gay man named Stewart requested her services for help with his upcoming wedding. “We are getting married early next year and would love some design work done for our invites, placenames etc. We might also stretch to a website,” reads a message he apparently sent her through her website.

But Stewart, who requested his last name be withheld for privacy, said in an interview with the Guardian that he never sent the message, even though it correctly lists his email address and telephone number. He has also been happily married to a woman for the last 15 years, he said. The news was first reported by the New Republic.[/quote]

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2023/jun/29/supreme-court-lgbtq-document-veracity-colorado[/quote]

Probably not, but can we rule out that Stewart is lying now, and at the time was secretly planning to leave his wife?

A manufactured case doesn't change the ruling.  Would liberals like to remove Lawrence v Texas?[/quote]
Yes, we can rule it out. The New Republic interviewed the guy and he had no clue his email and phone number were listed in filed documents with the Supreme Court. He had never heard of Smith. And conservatives are the ones who want to get rid of Lawrence vs. Texas.[/quote]

So the Supreme Court ruled on a case with an imaginary scenario?[/quote]
Yes[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics