Reply to FCPS At-Large School Board Race

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "FCPS At-Large School Board Race - Is County Split in Two? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Adding that I wish there were a moderate running outside of the democrats but there aren’t any.[/quote]

Davis is a moderate. If you think otherwise you are far to the left and can’t handle a mainstream candidate. [/quote]

She supports book banning. That is not moderate. It’s part of the right wing extremist playbook currently running in other states and in Spotsylvania County, VA.[/quote]

It is not "banning books"  to eliminate inappropriate materials for minors from schools.  "Banning books" means that books cannot be published or sold.  No one is calling for that.

While I'm not fan of Stacy Langdon, it is clear that the book she talked about at the SB meetings does not belong in any school library.  A graphic novel with pics of "parents" participating in what could kindly be called "out of the usual" sexual acts has no redeeming qualities.  [/quote]

Who should determine what is inappropriate? In states with policies like Langton wants, Toni Morrison and Jodi Picoult and many other authors are banned. https://abcnews.go.com/US/author-jodi-picoult-denounces-book-bans-after-florida/story?id=98151365

FCPS has a book challenge process, concerned people should follow it. I don’t want one untrained individual deciding to ban books from our school libraries.[/quote]

Yup. We already have a process for this and have for years! [/quote]

Handpicking a committee to state a desired outcome to keep the books is not an open transparent process. There should be a transparent process that: 
1) Articulates how the book encourages lifelong learning
2) That the material identifies with each student, with the understanding that not all material will identify with each student.

The books in question do not follow best practices with a library book selection process and are pervasively vulgar. Those advocating for the material cannot articulate the literary value of the books.

For example, if Lawn Boy was to be material to identify with young boys exploring their homosexuality, why does the author repeatedly reflect upon sexual experiences between two 10 yr-old boys? Why not make the characters 15, 16, or 17? Why 10 yr-olds engaged in oral sex? Most would even find that behavior between heterosexuals disturbing.

[b]Tonight, the two candidates, Melanie Meren and Paul Thomas advocated for such material under the guise of intersectionality and the need to provide inclusive material representative of the LGBTQIA++ community. [/b]

Then there is the recent book, 'Queer,' read by RWNJ Langton (who finally spoke against hetero porn), who does make a point, why is the school providing material to children to tell them that all sex is good sex? It isn't. 
[/quote]
Did they also recommend to the LGBTQ and its allies community at our schools the book [i]Irreversible Damage [/i]by Abigail Shrier in the name of diversity of opinion and inclusivity? If they didn’t, then it’s clear that they support book banning and solely advocate for a selected small group that doesn’t even represent the best interest of the LGBTQ community — nor the overall student population who, by default, are being dragged into this ideology.

Any School Board candidate who pays attention to the role the current board has had to allow this situation to linger and comes up with solutions to make everyone welcomed and respected, and that can be implemented from day one once on board, should have a great chance of winning. [/quote]

In one of his ‘spats of with community members,’ Jackson did hand out a flier to all members of Fairfax GOP calling Langton a ‘Beacon of Hate,’ for bullying a transgender  woman online and called for her ejection from the party. So no. None of the SB candidates on the other side align with Langton.[/quote]
This issue is no longer about party affiliation nor a particular person or another.  It’s gotten to the point where the elephant in the room needs to be acknowledged.  And whoever takes the lead to do so will have a great chance to succeed in the upcoming elections. [/quote]

Sorry - what is the elephant in the room?  [/quote]
No problem. This is the elephant in the room:

1. https://abigailshrier.substack.com/p/the-gender-cult-marches-on

2. https://edsource.org/2022/controversial-gender-ideology-in-public-education-undermines-families-of-faith/671790

3. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jun/20/stop-the-sexualization-of-our-children/
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics