Reply to Steps to fix the race to 3% admission rate

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Steps to fix the race to 3% admission rate"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]UCAS system is a better way IMO. And yes, they have elite schools too and a lot of kids with hopes pinned to them.

I'm not sure why private colleges that take federal money (ie 95%) don't have a US rate and a non-USA rate.[/quote]

The US would have to fund higher education a lot more to have the kind of say you want.  Yes, professors are funded by federal grants, but the benefits of those grants for society and private business in terms of both R&D, improved policy, and workforce training are estimated to be an easy 10fold return in the relative short-term and far more in the long-term.  Yes, some students are funded by loans, but it would be easier and cheaper for colleges to say you can't pay, you can't come and just teach the UMC/wealthy.  The benefits you are pointing to benefit society more than they do the colleges/universities so the government doesn't have a lot of bargaining power with colleges/universities.[/quote]

Not really. If federal funds were tied to tuition, schools would find a way to cut fat to bring down tuition and keep federal money [/quote]

A little bit maybe, but I think they would just accept fewer poor students.  Especially selective private schools which are the ones relevant to this thread (3% admission race).[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics