Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "I want a candidate who is 100% pro-choice BUT pretty anti-immigration & socially conservative "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. [b]Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit[/b], oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president. [/quote] Agreed. I'm an Independent and in some ways, one would think I'm conservative because of all these things; pro-police, strong border control, thinks trans women have no place in women's sports.. However, I am pro-choice and very much pro-gun control. I feel like I don't have a home in either party. [/quote] I don’t think trans women belong in women’s sports either but I’m smart enough to notice that republicans don’t otherwise care about or support women’s athletics; they’re using it as a wedge issue to begin attacking trans rights altogether and then on to attacking gay rights. LGBTQIA+ deserve human rights. See the long game.[/quote] DP. I find it utterly astounding that the issue of WOMEN'S rights seems to have utterly disappeared when discussing "trans rights." Why should biological men be able to compete against biological women? That's all it comes down to. Where are the [b]women's rights[/b] in that scenario? Where is the equity in that scenario? [/quote] You aren’t paying attention. The issue is being handled by sports bodies from the Olympics, NCAA, individual sport bodies, etc. and they all are making rules that would require a lengthy transition and low levels of testosterone for eligibility. In other words, no more Lia Thomases. This is not an issue for pandering demagogue governors and candidates. The swimming, tennis, track, etc. governing bodies are handling it. [/quote] The Biden Administration is mandating it. You speak of these individual sport bodies dealing with high level eligibility, while girls will be forced to accept boys in the locker room at so many other levels.[/quote] You are 100% full of sh*t. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics