Reply to "Justice" a new documentary on Kavanaugh

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to ""Justice" a new documentary on Kavanaugh "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Confirmation hearings.  If proved that he lied during these hearings,  then he can be impeached.  Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/
 
[/quote]

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted?  Because I believe that is much more likely.  [/quote]

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.[/quote]
Are you a forensic psychiatrist? If so I’d love to hear more. If not then you are a fool for posting this. [/quote]

Cute.

No, I'm not a "forensic psychiatrist" but someone trained in a much more relevant discipline.

Ford was clearly lying. She was making things up about her lie-detector test -- it was obvious.[/quote]

She looked insane and hysterical while testifying. Supposedly she is doctor? No way in hell she is a real doctor. It's unbelievable that some people who claim to be critical thinkers believed her. I've come to the conclusion that anyone who is ideological is incapable of being objective.[/quote]

[img]https://imgix.bustle.com/scary-mommy/2018/09/Kavanaugh-Crying.jpg?w=1200&h=630&fit=crop&crop=faces&fm=jpg[/img][/quote]

His behavior during the hearing should’ve disqualified him. Republicans had a majority and could’ve demanded Trump name someone else, similar to Harriet Myers under W. A Republican was going to be confirmed to the court and that person didn’t need to be Kavanaugh. [/quote]
+2

I say it again: Kavanaugh exists on the court because he’s the GOP’s middle finger to normal, non-extremist people. [/quote]
That plus he sits on the Court because Mitch McConnell ensured that Merrick Garland didn’t. Had Garland been confirmed, Trump would have only had 2 SC picks, at most. Since Gorsuch was the first choice, he would have taken the appointment Kavanaugh was given, and if Republicans felt RBG had to replaced with a woman, Coney Barrett would still have her appointment. Brett would not be on the SC, and we might possibly not have the same Dobbs decision because I’m not sure Roberts would have been willing to be the deciding vote to overturn Roe. Having 5 other justices vote to overturn settled law gave him cover.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics