Reply to How many of you are truly pro-choice?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "How many of you are truly pro-choice? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]At 17 I would probably try to guide my child to have an abortion, depending on how far along she was.

At 23 I would support whatever choice she wanted, assuming she doesn’t have a problems with substance abuse that would impact the pregnancy.

[/quote]
Same here. I guess that doesn't make me 100% pro-choice since I wouldn't exactly want my 17 year old DD to have a choice other than to have an abortion.[/quote]

Under 18, we 100% get a say…and probably veto power

If I have to pay for said choice for 18 years, it isn’t actually my child’s choice

This is the absolute truth. [/quote]

+1.  You will not be able to force any child to have an abortion. As a parent, if you live in a state with parental consent, you may be able to prevent your DC from getting an abortion.

Not sure why you think you will have to “pay for said choice for 18 years”.

The 18 yo mother and father are legally and financially responsible for your grandchild.

You think you have a say, but legally you absolutely don't. Do you think any doctor will prescribe a morning after pill or preform an abortion on a 17 year old who is adamant that they don't want the procedure? [/quote][/quote]

ok, but if she doesn't, I am not planning to pay to raise the child. I will present teen who is still financially dependent on us with the financial options.

She can choose to go forward, but it will be without our financial help.[/quote]

You legally cannot stop caring financially for your child. At least until age 18, and they have graduated from high school. You can be charged with various crimes for refusing to provide your minor child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and educational support.

I am amazed the hhi sjws posting here don’t know that. [/quote]
Pregnancy is emancipating.[/quote]

It's a ground for emancipation. Are you going to take your pregnant kid to court in order to no longer provide for them?[/quote]

pp seems particularly unhappy to have to imagine a world where they might have to part with their precious money to support their own daughter and grandchild in the event of an unexpected pregnancy.

I wonder if the same group here complaining about the costs of supporting their own child and grandchild object to the millions American taxpayers must pay for people who enter America and get free ob-gyn care, pre-natal care, WIC, food stamps, housing assistance? Are they more worthy of that money than your own child and grandchild?[/quote]

And how about those people who object to abortions and free contraception and then complain about having taxes go to support “welfare queens” and their children?[/quote]

Start your own thread.

pp and many others posting on this thread don’t think they should have to financially contribute to the wellbeing of their own daughter and grandchild. Ask them how they feel about paying taxes for strangers and their kids?[/quote]

Goodness someone is touchy. Aren’t we having a discussion about what you see as hypocrisy? People who want to ban abortion and then complain about paying for babies in poverty are certainly hypocrites.

As for me, I hope my taxes go to helping fellow human beings. [/quote]

meanwhile a pp is ready to take their own pregnant daughter to court to abandon her while pregnant with their grandchild

the babies aborted are definitely human beings, too.[/quote]

Clearly you never learned science moron[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics