Reply to Admission for athletic recruits

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Admission for athletic recruits"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hopkins is much more lax with their D1 lax admissions standard than their standards for D3 sports.

The bigger the stage in the sport, the more relaxed the standard tends to be. On the high academic side, that translates to power 5 schools like Stanford, Northwestern, Vandy, and Duke having more admissions flexibility than the athletically less competitive Ivy League schools, which have more flexibility than the D3 schools like MIT, Chicago, Wash U, Swarthmore, Amherst, Williams, most of Hopkins, ect. [/quote]
For non revenue sports, Stanford has a higher minimum score threshold than the Ivy League. No index though, so you could have a team with lots of kids who scored in the 1300-1350 range, where Ivy teams will have a handful who scored in the 1200-1250 range and the majority much higher. [/quote]

This is incorrect for almost all non-revenue sports. I was on the Stanford campus for much of the last decade and am familiar with their athletic dept. It is true that there are a few sports, like squash and sailing to name a couple, where most of the student-athletes at the very highest level sport wise are already scoring well above 1300, so they are not seeing a dip at Stanford. In those few sports, Stanford's teams are as strong academically as the Ivy League or even the high-academic D3s, but that is the limited exception and not the rule. If someone is a rockstar in a sport but has much lower academic profile though, Stanford could get them in while the Ivy coach would be out of luck. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics