Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "upzoning: what will it really change?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s less the upzoning itself and more the lack of infrastructure funding. You bring in more people, you need more capacity in school, on roads and transit, and other services. The problem lies in the “incentives” for developers to build more, which often means waving impact taxes for a decade or more. Somebody has to pay for things, and it’s pretty much always going to be the residents. Either existing homeowners through property taxes, or new residents through costs being pushed onto housing costs. Developers NEVER make any concessions. They ALWAYS maximize profit. [/quote] You can solve that problem by getting rid of the incentives. [/quote] That doesn't solve the problem of over capacity schools that can't handle additional students, police and fire stations already miles away, parking and roads designed for limited traffic. That being said, the areas around metro stations and the new foxhall elementary school is ripe for increased density because of their soon to be excess school space. The main problem with upzoning is a complete unwillingness to acknowledge that the social infrastructure is capped out and there is no land to build what would be needed.[/quote] everyone wants to stuff Ward 3 until it breaks. FYI - it has Deal and Wilson. But appease the whiners and build Foxhall. Yikes - worst locale ever: why not invest in schools that are failing ?? [/quote] Stuff Ward 3? Ward 3 lags behind a lot of the rest of the city. It's Ward 6 that's been getting stuffed to the gills. So much so that the ward map had to be redistricted due to excessive Ward 6 growth. And they did it without meaningfully dealing with infrastructure or services needed to support growth. Meanwhile, contrary to all of the YIMBY and GGWash claims, despite a big increase in density and adding over 35,000 units and more people to W6 in the last 10 years, housing prices have NOT gone down. Housing prices in W6 have gone UP.[/quote] Focusing on Wards 7 and 8 make the most sense. Encourage development there.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics