Reply to Teacher Resident - no teaching qualifications required?

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Teacher Resident - no teaching qualifications required?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And I meant it made sense for high school because they can skip the education degree part. [/quote]

The resident teacher role only allows you to skip licensing requirements for the first year  (And licensed high school teachers typically get a BA/BS in their subject area and either do a post-bac education courses or master's in education in VA to be fully licensed).  The thing that is new is this resident teacher position just requires a 4 year degree and doesn't require passing the praxis--not even for the subject areas they are going to teach.  It's problematic because it's not like you're going to be told your child's teacher is a "resident teacher" so people are going to be very confused when  teachers don't have content knowledge.  If your teacher is a long term sub you kind of know they may or may not have deep content knowledge and adjust accordingly.

I'm all for the resident teacher position given that there's a teacher shortage, I just think the praxis should be the bar to pass. It's a 1-4 hour test depending on subject area and there are on-line resources to study for it.  It shouldn't be a problem for anyone who is capable of teaching the subject (though it's not an easy test, these are people who did get a college degree).  Otherwise people are going to waste a lot of energy of mentoring, supporting a person who is not capable of passing the test.  (There are people who enroll in graduate education programs who can't pass the praxis after many tries and have to go teach in Catholic/private schools that don't require it or switch out of the field).[/quote]

Isn't there a curriculum, and all the teachers have to teach the same thing out of the same text or work books?[/quote]

lolololololololol

*breathe*

lolololololololol

Okay, sorry.

I have taught 14 years and never had a workbook or a textbook to use for any of the courses I taught (middle/high school).  Every single paper your kid gets is made from scratch by me, purchased by me online, or made in collaboration with my team.

This is such a common misconception though--I think it's why people think teaching is acceptably paid, why anyone can do it, why teachers are idiots when there are mistakes on papers.  The general public thinks we are reading scripts, when in reality teachers are literally creating an 8 hour meeting agenda and all associated handouts every. single. day.[/quote]

So a PP is saying that my child’s resident teacher hasn’t even passed the exam required to be a teacher? Like they could have a four year degree from the university of phoenix in something like sociology and be considered a fifth grade teacher??? And then you’re saying there’s no curriculum for them to follow? It’s just going to be a free for all?? WTF????

[/quote]

Don't worry, the test teachers have to pass is pretty much a joke and has nothing to do with actual teaching.  Plenty of fully qualified teachers are terrible at the job, too.  Honestly, you've as good a chance of getting a decent teacher either way.  About 50/50.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics