Reply to SCOTUS Protection Request

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS Protection Request"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Also January 6th and the GOP response to it erased any moral high ground you could claim relating to violent protest. [/quote]

I've really never understood this line of reasoning.  Two wrongs don't make a right.  We learn this as children.

I can think that violent protest on 1/6 was reprehensible and also think that any subsequent violent protest that occurs "on the left" is also reprehensible.[/quote]
There hasn’t been violent protest. Just because that’s how you forced birthers have acted doesn’t mean that that’s how pro choice advocates are doing it.[/quote]

I am not a forced-birther.  I was responding to the person who appeared to say that any member of the GOP could not claim that "violent protest" is wrong.  And also possibly imply that violent protest is henceforth justified because of 1/6.
I am a registered democrat who thinks that certain things are morally/ethically/legally wrong or right regardless of the political party involved.

[/quote]

What I meant was the GOP doesn't get to simultaneously point to protests from the summer of 2020 as evidence of moral decay and violence by the left (as one poster in this thread is indeed doing) AND declare in their national party platform that Jan. 6th was "legitimate political discourse", which they officially did in February of this year.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics