Reply to Common Sense Gun Laws

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Common Sense Gun Laws"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]- license and pass a safety test (just like we have for cars)
- license can be taken away for violations, safety hazards (just like for cars)
- insurance required (just like we have for cars)
- police need to have more powerful weapons that citizenry are allowed (just like for cars, police can access equipment citizenry can’t)

Americans love cars just like they love guns. But we seem not to have totally lost their mind over them.
[/quote]

I absolutely disagree with your stance on police. They and the rest of us non military need nothing more than a handgun and in reality I'd prefer not even that.

Those in the military can have other styles of guns when on duty only. Not to be kept at home. Same for those that hunt.they can go to designated areas and sign in and out [/quote]

This is not constitutional.  But even if it was now you do not have the support needed to do anything.[/quote]

[img]https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/283922416_151896804050085_7300622446566679042_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5cd70e&_nc_ohc=D2G1H3jdCIkAX8B1zmO&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=00_AT-AjKO9IaZ5ZfvRuA6XPvraz6mK1xU_doSMAWqtCCmcyA&oe=6299926A[/img][/quote]

Excellent image.  We don't have to accept this extremely perverted nonsense the gun nuts try to sell about the 2nd amendment.

This is our country to set the rules that we want.  The usa does not belong to daniel defense and it's Ilk so they can shove off.[/quote]

Play on words like this is asinine and convinces no one. By this same rationale, we can't maintain a police department  for the purpose of public peace keeping if individual police officers may be corrupt.[/quote]
[b]
To the contrary, that an assault weapons ban is perfectly legal and desireable is a fact[/b].

What's wrong?   You will miss strutting around and shooting your big big big powerful assualt weapon?   Awwww.  It will be ok.[/quote]

You have the burden of proof on that.

I don't know where you live that have people strutting around and just shooting their guns off, but I recommend that you move asap. 
[/quote]

We had an assualt weapon ban and a high capacity magazines ban and it was fine.  It was not struck down....pathetically it expired.   It will be even more pathetic if we do not reinstate it.[/quote]

Recent bans have been ruled unconstitutional. It's highly likely that the original ban was also unconstitutional given recent court outcome. So  again, you have the burden of proof. [/quote]

2A definitely says "well regulated militia"

If SCOTUS isn't specifically addressing that then SCOTUS would be behaving unconstitutionally and shouldn't be allowed to overturn regulation.[/quote]

That clause does not allow a ban on so-called assault weapons. [/quote]

We get that you are pleased with shooting or selling weapons that blow people's heads off quickly and efficiently one after the other.   But you can find another hobby or another product to sell.    If this country does not want these weapons to be legal, then we will arrange to have them not be legal.  That's the way the cookie crumbles [/quote]

That is still not an argument that banning of assault weapons is constitutional.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics