Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I like the idea of requiring Geometry, but removing the barriers to taking 7th grade Algebra. The problem with the current process is that a kid can get As in M7H and the first half of Algebra by using rote process and without having a strong understanding of the math. The second half of Algebra as well as Geometry are more conceptual and require more of a leap. Earning As in both Algebra I Honors and the first half of Geometry Honors would show that a kid is capable of handling TJ math. Earning As in M7H and half of Algebra I doesn't really show any math aptitude. Coupling this with the removal of an objective test and the removal of teacher recommendations means that the TJ panel has no way to identify and weed out kids who are likely to be unsuccessful with the TJ math program. FCPS could offer free summer bridge programs in the lower SES schools to prepare rising 7th graders for Algebra I. They could also offer support through programs like AVID. There's no reason to gatekeep Algebra I in 7th rather than advise people on the most appropriate level, but ultimately let them choose for themselves. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics