Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Latin v. BASIS"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]But gentrification will only help schools that are being gentrified. Yet we will probably always have concentrations of poverty, and parents who can't speak English/work the system.[/quote] Gentrified schools have lots of econ-disadvantaged students getting a better education TODAY. More gentrified schools = more disadvantaged kids getting better educations. [quote=Anonymous]So why set up a system of winner-take-all, where the gentrifying schools with the savvy, pushy parents lobby for and get all the resources?[/quote] [b]Your assumption is wrong. Gentrifying schools do not get more resources, they get fewer resources as the school gets better. Higher poverty and lower performing schools get significantly more resources.[/b] [quote=Anonymous]Doesn't a system of charters, where the families who want to leave the "terrible" schools have that option, sound better?[/quote] Yes, charters are a part of the solution because they keep middle class families in DC and increase economic integration in public schools.[/quote] Well there must a few unaccounted for variables there. By that logic, JKLM & Deal should have few, if any resources and Brookland, Langley, and Noyes should be rolling in them. Yet, such is not the case.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics