Reply to BASIS: PCSB staff recommends conditional continuance due to SWD

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "BASIS: PCSB staff recommends conditional continuance due to SWD"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]But is it discrimination against other SN to advertise that BASIS could be a very good fit for kids with SN that make them pretty rigid?  [/quote]

If they're advertising in a way that suggests they will only support specific disabilities or profiles, then yes, that would be extremely problematic.  You see private schools and camps advertise in that way and it's clearly meant to exclude kids with higher support/perceived higher support needs, as well as, frankly, kids with autism who are "too" autistic.

Remember just because Basis is a charter does not mean they are exempt from supporting kids with SN of all levels.  They can't just pick and chose.  The Charter Board pointed out that Basis has basically no higher-needs kids.  [/quote]

The SN boosters here are missing the point altogether in their zeal and assumptions.

The point is that Basis would likely make a great fit for any student who does well with structure, clear expectations, focus on individual work, lots of emphasis on organization and concrete curriculums. Many kids with HFA would fit the bill.

Emphasising those strengths and talking about how this kind of learning can benefit some students would be a way to message that out to families with all types of kids, including HFA or others and might encourage kids who otherwise wouldn't think to apply. [/quote]

"SN Booster"? Really?  Forgive me for having "zeal and assumptions" as I attempt to ensure my child with disabilities gets an education.

[b]As much as you want Basis to be exempt from special education laws,[/b] it is not. It would be great if Basis established and funded an HFA program and advertised it.  That doesn't allow it to screen for certain disabilities and levels of disabilities.  Clearly Basis has a serious issue retaining and serving kids with disabilities.  Falling back on "oh the few we have do well" does not fix that problem.  [/quote]

NO ONE HAS SAID THIS. NOT ONE POST. These are the assumptions you are making. You are applying your lens of persecution onto this report and all posts. [/quote]

Except you keep on refusing to listen to people who are telling you that your ideas would not meet special education requirements. Not sure what else you want me to say.  Are you clear that Basis can't pick and chose the disabled kids it educates? It can't decide that it will only support a particular type or level of disability?  That it can't implicitly or expressly communicate that kids with disability have to be a certain "fit"?  [/quote]

Do you even have a kid in DC?  Are you considering Basis?

You sounds like an intern at Brookings.[/quote]

I’m a mom of a SN kid who has been repeatedly warned against Basis because they don’t provide adequate supports. [/quote]

But you don’t actually know if they do or don’t. You are just aflame based on what you hear elsewhere and extrapolating your own preconceived notions of what people are “really” saying despite the words on the page. Zero actual evidence for any of your fury. [/quote]

oh right, their charter is just at risk because  they aren’t “marketing” to SN kids. they have a terrible reputation with therapists in DC because they do such a great job![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics