Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "No more safeties since they now focus on yield protection? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, it is, given ED is creeping up to north of 40 percent[/quote] A, that’s dramatically inflated by recruited athletes, who aren’t looking for safeties. And B, 40% is now a safety? Terrible take. Do better. [/quote] The take was not easybecause it was 8%. That number is not a real reflection of what it is like to get in to many of these very good schools. Multiple rounds of ED require a more nuanced approach to reach/match/safety calculations or perhaps just a recognition that such a breakdown is simply not relevant.[/quote] Yes, the overall 8% is actually higher than any “regular” kid could expect, because at small schools like Colby there is a significant percentage of recruited athletes and their acceptance rate is something very close to 100%. The poster could have made a good point by asserting that beyond a certain level of LAC admission is pretty easy. But is sure isn’t at number 11. Even in the sixties and seventies they are rejecting about half of applicants. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics