Reply to Pope says no to blessing same-sex unions

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Pope says no to blessing same-sex unions"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]So next we inspect the natural world to guess at his design. Nature is full of homosexuality. Nature is full of creatures that switch genders. Nature is full of creatures that switch between sexual and asexual reproduction. And people can be born with XY chromosomes and female genitalia. What part of God's design was that, and could he please explain who this person can marry? No, you have to arbitrarily throw out these many contradictions in nature because they are not the norm. Guess what? Celibacy is not the norm, and yet the Church allows it and even expects it of some people. Why does the Church create an exception to this idea that procreation is fundamental to our design?
[/quote]

No, nature is not full of homosexuality.  It is amazing how people scrape the bottom of the logic barrel in an attempt to justify this sin.  Anyone who has been around dogs knows that its mating instinct can be triggered and will attempt to "mate" with your leg.  The instances of so-called homosexuality in animals is that when a male had mated with a female and the estruus remained on the mating male, another male animal attempted to mate because its mating instincts were triggered by the chemicals in the estruus. Mammals mate when the female goes into heat.

Because we are in a fallen state, there are mutations and deformities that can cause a person to have genitalia different than the chromosomes. This is not normal, it is an extremely rare condition, but people want to use this as a means for "the exception to prove the rule."  Sorry, it does not work that way, any more than you can say schizophrenia is normal.

Homosexuality is a conscious, willful choice. To be one, that person has to deny the biological truth that 2 people of the same sex "mating" with one another cannot produce a baby. [b]Somehow, it has to enter the mind that, "Yes, I produce sperm designed to impregnate a woman but I 'feel/think/believe' otherwise." It is a travesty that our culture does not try to correct these confused people but encourage them in their sexually disoriented state. [/b]

No person is "born gay" and there is no "gay gene", just as no person is born a murderer or has a gene for adultery.  There are people who have hormonal imbalances that cause, for instance, a male to be less masculine and a woman to be less feminine, and often these people as children are picked on and ridiculed for being different and so they gravitate towards homosexuality.  Others are molested as children, or fall victim to propaganda that convinces the confused person to attempt to mate with a member of the same sex.

The sole and only purpose for sperm is to fertilize an egg.  Therefore, sex is to be between male and female which is how God designed the human body.  We do not produce asexually or any other manner.

Why is this self-evident truth, an elementary basic fact for crying out loud,  so difficult for people, most of whom are found in the Democratic party, to understand?  I can only conclude such people are evil, their minds seared as with a hot iron, their minds given over to a reprobate mind that refuses to see truth. [/quote]

I too agree that marriages between infertile couples should automatically be dissolved [/quote]

Really? After they get married and discover they suffer from infertility, their marriage should be made invalid in the church? Some couples don't suffer from it indefinitely. I know couples who were able to conceive after year without using IFV or anything else. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics