Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "AAP Equity report"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why is this called an "Equity" report. Gifted Education is based on the assumption that everyone is not of equal intelligence, equal ability. [/quote] Because it is assumed that kids of all races are gifted but some are undiscovered.[/quote] Then why do they have to lower standards for some particular races in order to call them gifted or advanced?[/quote] The report stated that [b]all races had similar means and ranges[/b] for test scores. There was no recommendation to change that.[/quote] I don't see your repeated claim about this is true. Using NNAT scores as the example: Mean scores for all students: Asian=113.6, White=107.5, Black=97.6 Mean scores for Level 4 eligibles: Asian=129, White=118, Black=111 Max scores for Level 4 eligibles: Asian=160, White=160, Black=142 I don't think these can be called "similar". You forgot to put in the MINIMUM scores for all Level 4 eligible students: WHITE = 70 (this is the 2nd percentile rank!!!!) , Asian = 93, Black = 85 [/quote][/quote] You forgot to put in the MINIMUM scores for all Level 4 eligible students: [b]WHITE = 70 (this is the 2nd percentile rank!!!!) , Asian = 93, Black = 85[/quote][/b] Many of these likely had WISC or other test that was high. You all have way too much trust that this number from a single administration of a group test tells you much.[/quote] Why is it when a score from a white student is low, it is discounted, but not if a score from an URM is low? Outside testing like the WISC should NOT be allowed. It rigs the system in favor of affluent households. Then add in GRBS which the report flat out states is biased. The largest group of students who are being missed are kids on FARM. I think the report says only 6% qualified. I think the district as a whole is almost 30% FARMS. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics