Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "It appears Bolton's book undercuts Trump's defense"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]He has to be called as a witness. The Senate's verdict loses all credibility otherwise.[/quote] So why didn't Shiff call him? What changed? He wasn't needed in the house.[/quote] The House requested that Bolton testify, but he said he would not -- on the instructions of the WH -- without a court-ruled-on subpoena. [/quote] And, Pelosi, et al, did not issue a subpoena to Bolton AND they withdrew their subpoena for Kupperman. It is not the Senate's role to tidy up the mess the House left. If the Dems thought that Bolton's testimony was so important, they should have subpoenaed him and had the courts enforce it, if necessary. And, don't say it would have taken "years." It would not have..... the Dems simply had the self-imposed deadline of "finishing it before Christmas" so they rushed it along. Nancy Pelosi is looking less and less like the strategic genius that the Dems claim she is. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
