Reply to The Last Skywalker

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "The Last Skywalker— with Spoilers"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm laughing at the desperate prequel fanboys and girls. Sorry, the prequels sucked. Most rational fans recognize that.

Thankfully George Lucas sold to Disney or we would have had those monstrosities duplicated in 7-9. Did you see the interview where Lucas was going to go full on Midiclorian in 7-9, and add another kind of magic force virus? What a mess that would have been.[/quote]

And the Disney ones suck even worse. Hence why every movie since 2015 has been losing money.

Say what you want, the prequels are canon and come from Lucas. They aren’t lazy rehashes like the Disney movies that just lazily repeat the original trilogy with awful badly written characters no one will care about in 3 years. [/quote]

Losing money??! Are you delusional?

First of all, Lucas said the Disney ones are canon. So you need to get over that. Second, they’ve all made a TON of money.

Force Awakens: budget $260-300M; box office $2B
Last Jedi: budget $200-300M; box office $1.3B
Rise of Skywalker: budget $275M; box office $453 (and it’s been out for a week)

I disagree that the movies are lazy. I love the new characters. The Skywalker story wasn’t finished because Palpatine wasn’t dead yet, which is why the themes had to be revisited.

There are 3 more Star Wars movies coming out that Lucasfilms has said will be very different, so you’ll get your different themes then. [/quote]

Umm the delusional one is you. In your own post, you’ll see the movies have been losing money yearly, not growing. Do you know how basic math and economics work? You clearly do not.

https://slate.com/culture/2019/12/star-wars-rise-of-skywalker-box-office-opening-weekend.html[/quote]

Huh? [/quote]

The movies....since 2015....have been losing....money.

2015: 2B
2016: 1.05B
2017: 1.3B 
2018: 392 Million

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

[/quote]

1. Over time they make more money. Unless you’re citing year-long figures, your post makes no sense.

2. Losing money usually means costing more than they bring in. Your post is exceptionally unclear at best.[/quote]

They HAVENT been making more over time. That’s what articles like this is pointing out.

https://www.looper.com/128174/what-solos-failure-means-for-the-future-of-star-wars/[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics