Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "People who were teens in 80's... what did you think of 16 candles at the time?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]At the time I thought is was creepy that Jake was interested in Samantha. Samantha looked like a little kid. He Came off as a pedophile. [/quote] +1000 Could you image Jake showing up to take your 13-14 year old daughter on a date?[/quote] [b]Times were different, as many have noted here. The most popular girl in my 7th grade class in 1984 was dating a senior in high school. We were all insanely jealous that she was going to the prom[/b].[/quote] When I was 16-17 I routinely dated guys who were 19-20, which I have seen some people here characterize as rape. I did not and still do not think there was anything wrong or rapey about having been that age and dating guys who were three years older than me. [/quote] She was not 16-17 she was like 13-14 dating a 18-19 year old. Would you let your freshman dd date him? Jake breaks up with a full grown woman to date an underdeveloped girl. This is not normal or desirable....it pretty sick.[/quote] In the movie, Samantha is 16 (duh, it’s her birthday) and Jake is 18. She’s a sophomore, he’s a senior. No big deal. Underdeveloped? Most thin girls in HS don’t have boobs. I did think their personalities were an odd match, but not their age or level of “development”. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics