Reply to Cambridge tour vs Sussex tour

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Cambridge tour vs Sussex tour"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Cambridge s see their duty as a job where the Sussexes see it as a lifestyle[/quote]

The Cambridges aren't exactly the hardest working royals. In fact, I distinctly remember there being quite an aversion to how little they do in their role.  Kate was known as The Duchess of Do-Little.[/quote]

Yes, this is the point though isn't it? She didn't whine on and on about her poor life. She didn't hide away when topless photos of her emerged from her boat. She kept on. 
They are not hte hardest working royals, i think Anne pretty much surpasses anyone really. I don't think many Royals work terribly hard, that is why Meghan crying about things not being fair is just so, um. Entitled? What does she want. What will make her happy? She has NO 9-5 job. Does not have to worry about bills or child care or cooking or shopping . She gets designer clothing and gets to highlight charities. Instead of embracing this opportunity and 'job' she cries about unfair headlines about her. [b]None of which are untrue I might add. 
The headlines weren't that she spilled the tea about an affair. The headlines were she is spending like crazy, has gone through mroe staff in a year than the Queen has in decades, has cleared out entire sections of the Wimbledon stadium etc etc. ALL of that is true.[/b] [/quote]

Wrong.

The headlines about Meghan are lies, slander, and complete fabrications. They deliberately mislead and over-embellish actions while either outright praising or ignoring other royals who do the same thing.

The funny thing is this is exactly what the changes after Diana's death were supposed to fix. The tabloids were forbidden from following royals or private citizens like paparazzi in public ordinary situations. The legal changes didn't take into account digital abuse which is what we're encountering now.

[/quote]

Hacking a phone is digital abuse and should rightly be stopped.

Printing unflattering headlines isn't "digital abuse".  It's just printing unflattering headlines.  [/quote]

Printing unflattering headlines every day for three years without ceasing and while the recipient in heavily pregnant is abuse. It's a digital campaign to target, harass, and harm a single person.

The funny thing is someone like Rebekah Vardy got ONE day of the same type of headlines while pregnant and her people were crying bloody murder. Even the press backed off.

It's not that the British don't understand the effects on maternal health, they just don't care when it comes to a mixed race royal.

youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RmMdUkudIQ[/youtube][/quote]

Do you know what "digital" means?[/quote]

The British tabloids get more clicks and online readers in one day than they do in a single week's circulation of print media.

All she is asking for FAIRNESS. You want to castigate one royal for wearing an off-shoulder dress, don't call the other an angel for the doing the same.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics