Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Cities with No Children"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] +1. There's actually a lot of affordable housing in Washington. It's just not where people want to be -- they want affordable housing that's surrounded by coffee shops and cool bars and has great schools. [/quote] If there's so much affordable housing, how come such a large proportion of people are spending such a large proportion of their income on housing costs?[/quote] There’s a difference between “affordable” housing and committed affordable housing. I think PP is pointing out that many people can afford to live close-in, but maybe not in the hot or fashionable neighborhoods, and choose instead to stretch and spend more of their take-home pay on “unaffordable” housing in their desired location, or they move further out to find areas that meet their other criteria, and give up on desired proximity. I think PP is specifically talking about DCUM posters who consider large swaths of the city and close-in suburbs unacceptable because of their proximity to lower income populations who live in committed affordable housing. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics