Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Boundary review can’t come soon enough"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The study simply re-states the obvious: high-density, low-income schools consistently fail to educate the students. The majority of DC public schools are just like this, with very little racial and economic diversity. There are only a few exceptions, not counting the charters. Schools integrated with diversity from higher-income students (regardless of race) perform better, and consequently have less of gap in performance between students of different races at those schools. What DOESN'T help is to accuse parents of RACISM who don't want their kids to attend those obviously terrible learning environments. In fact, the study reinforces why parents who can choose better consistently avoid those schools. The belief that racism is "the reason" is counter-productive in the sense that it perpetuates the problem. Structural racism may be a major "cause" for the problem that exists, but it is literally self-defeating to accuse the parents of high SES students of racism, when in the moment they're trying to do the best they can to educate their children.[/quote] Racism discussions aside, I think the main implications of this sort of research apply to boundary discussions, which is the topic of the OP. Since research seems to suggest that minority students are helped and white students are not harmed by integrated schools, I think DCPS will continue to prioritize integrated schools when the boundary discussion resurfaces in a few years.[/quote] Boundary discussions go hand-in-hand with incentives provided by DCPS for higher SES to attend. Hardy is a decent example: DCPS was slow to "waste money" on incentives that very few used at first, but within about 2 years the in-boundary rates increased markedly.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics