Reply to WaPo uncovers Liz Warren’s 1986 bar app. Race handwritten as “American Indian”

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "WaPo uncovers Liz Warren’s 1986 bar app. Race handwritten as “American Indian” "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't care. Do you?[/quote]

Do you think that was okay and honest?[/quote]
you're kidding, right?  You want to talk about "honesty".. um okay.. how about honesty from our POTUS.  This app was.. what... 40 years ago?  FFS.[/quote]

First of all, nice whataboutism.
Secondly, are you one of the morons outraged about what Northam - and/or Kavanaugh - had in their yearbooks, 35+ yrs. ago?  
-DP[/quote]
sexual assault is a bigger deal than lying about your enthnicity.

And I'm not white.[/quote]

[b]Definitely agree - if there was proof or corroborating evidence *of any kind* that sexual assault ever occurred.  But there wasn't - not a shred. [/b] So this is actually a much bigger deal.  [/quote]

Please don't insult us, yourself and this conversation by making a political statement that is not true at all. ARe you the one who keeps posting that?  Please stop. There was a lot of corroborating evidence. Just stop it.  There was not incontrovertible proof. Those are the words you are looking for. 
https://rewire.news/ablc/2018/10/04/corroborating-evidence-christine-blasey-ford-allegations/

[/quote]

Ah yes, you're the poster who thinks you're "schooling" the rest of us with your lectures on "incontrovertible proof".  Just stop.  Americans, even those with political axes to grind, know that there simply wasn't enough of *anything* to conclude that Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted anyone.  You can claim there was corroborating evidence, but there simply wasn't.  Goodbye.[/quote]

This is what happens when an unfit candidate is pushed through. It will always happen when Kavanaugh is discussed. [/quote]

"Unfit"?  He was roundly admired as one of the most qualified candidates for the SC in years.  The only people who see him as "unfit" are those who wanted a liberal on the court and didn't get their way.[/quote]

He got added to the list because trump needed someone he could control to let him off on the criminal charges! [/quote]

Yes, that's it - for sure.  Even though Kavanaugh explicitly said he would always vote independently and cannot be "controlled" by presidential whim.  Nice try, though![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics