Reply to Voter suppression

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Voter suppression "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Again, there are many people who never do those things for any number of reasons: they may have a spouse or family member who does most of the logistics of their lives, and they may not have adequate transportation themselves. Many people are dependent on a family member but this does not mean that they should not be allowed to vote.
[/quote]

No.  There are not "many people" like this.  [/quote]

You don't get out much. Yes, yes there are.

And why would the Supreme Court say that native americans in North Dakota cannot use PO boxes, common in rural areas, for their voter registrations? That is totally discriminatory.[/quote]
It was stated they could use a common address. People in rural areas have addresses but no mail service.[/quote]

Most people in rural areas do have mail service but as I understand it this is not the case on the reservations. The ND had been under an injunction by a federal judge since 2016 until the Supreme Court upheld it a couple of weeks ago. This changed the rules in ND since the injunction was in place during the primaries; this came up during arguments. The reservations are scrambling to implement a system and get IDs out in a very short period of time.

People who yammer about dead voters fail to realize that just because a deceased person has not been removed from registration rolls has nothing to do with whether that person's identity is actually used to vote. Presumably there would be a way to confirm whether that has occurred or how often.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics