Reply to The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "The Role of Anti-Clinton FBI Agents"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote]Chills or not, actions are more important than words. Nothing about the Trump investigation was leaked or officially revealed before the election. If anyone was interested in stopping Trump, simply confirming the investigation to Harry Reid would have been enough. But, [b]everyone in the FBI acted to protect Trump.[/b] On the other hand, NYC office FBI agents leaked information about Weiner's laptop forcing Comey to disclose its existence to Congress which led to the information being made public. The fact that rogue FBI agents had a direct affect in hurting Clinton during the campaign should give you far more chills than a simple text. 
[/quote]

Giving credence to a bogus dossier is not protecting Trump.  There is some reason to consider that perhaps Strozk started this whole thing.  Details are still sketchy--but, he did go to London.

As far as "rogue" FBI agents--reporting that your superiors are possibly stalling an investigation is a whistleblower--not a "rogue" agent.

And, lest we forget:  there is one person to blame for the email situation---Hillary Clinton.  We now know that foreign government did hack into her computer --and, it is likely Russia.  There is reason to believe that this happened while she was in Russia and used her email.  She also emailed with Barack Obama on this unsecured server. 
Don't blame the "rogue" agent.

Read the report.[/quote]

You continue to live in fantasy land. By the time the FBI received the dossier, they had already been investigating the Trump campaign. Nunes was not the superior of the FBI agents who went to him within a couple of days of the discovery of the laptop. There is no way that you can argue that the NYC office needed to whistleblow almost immediately. Moreover, even if you can rationalize leaking to Nunes, you can't excuse leaking to Giuliani. These were indeed rogue agents who actually took direct actions that impacted the election. I know that you want to excuse that, but doing so only highlights your partisanship.

Please provide proof that a foreign government hacked her computer. That is simply not supported by evidence. This is another example of your stating your wishful thinking as fact.

While you wish to excuse the actors who actually influenced the election with their unauthorized activities, I am going to continue to blame those who are guilty.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics