Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]DPR has finally put the recent meeting presentation on its website, with three pool siting alternatives. My overall reaction is, for all this money and attention, DPR is proposing a very small pool, kind of a kiddie pool for adults. For comparison purposes, the pool footprint is smaller than one tennis court and smaller than one of the penalty areas of the soccer field. It's as if Cheh and DPR are going through the motions to say "Ward 3 pool. Check." There's a good question of whether it's worth the effort. The three alternatives each have drawbacks. #1 has the pool located directly alongside two tennis courts which doesn't seem optimal. #2 puts the pool closer to 37th St and the parking area but shrinks the filed by putting it on a N-S orientation. #3 puts the pool on the south side of the park but totally eliminates the shoulder/spectator area for the field. If the pool stays small, the better option might be to move it south of the small turf field, closer to the parking lot, thus leaving other areas of the park alone. None are great options. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics