Reply to Seriously with the book banning ?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Seriously with the book banning ?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Awfully quiet in here.[/quote]
Is it?

Sounds like teachers don’t think that book is a useful resource in the classroom anymore. That’s not banning.

The struggle for fascists to feel like not fascists is real, I’m sure, but I also think you guys are currently beyond redemption. [/quote]

:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: 
OMG.  I can't even with your moving the goalposts every time Democrats are caught being hypocrites - which is every single day.  You people are such a joke.
DP[/quote]
Okay?

“Banning” is a real word with a specific meaning. What these teachers did isn’t “banning.” What the Orwellian named “Moms for Liberty” is doing is banning. Several elected Republicans have been giddy about banning and burning books.

Your party is fascist. [/quote]

So - just to be clear - you consider keeping school libraries full of AGE-APPROPRIATE books to be "banning," even though the books in question are widely available at any bookstore, public library, Amazon, etc.  But somehow, teachers saying "To Kill a Mockingbird" is inappropriate and will not be part of the required curriculum, is NOT banning.

[b]Also, exactly which elected Republican is "giddy about banning and [b]burning[/b] books"?  We'll wait while you dredge up some BS from a LWNJ propaganda site.[/b][/quote]

Will students be able to check out To Kill a Mockingbird from the school library if they want to, even if teachers don't put it in the curriculum? Yes or no?[/quote]

I don't know the answer to that question, but bravo on deflecting from the question YOU were asked first.  Still waiting on an answer and specific examples.  [/quote]

And yet you refuse to answer the question of where the sex acts in Maus are.  Or how deciding to not demand To Kill a Mockingbird be in a school curriculum is the exact same thing as removing it from a school entirely so any kid who wanted to read it would have to go out of their way to find a copy.

Still waiting on an answer for both those.[/quote]

JFC.  YOU ARE TALKING TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE.  I never said anything about Hustler or Maus.  And it's clear that you aren't able to answer the question asked of you, bolded for your convenience.  Noted.  [/quote]
You are also talking to different people.

Watch any DeSantis video on his idiotic book bans. Smug is basically politician giddy. That dumb ducker’s smug and giddy as hell about banning books. Or he was when he thought it would get him to be the nominee.

And this fella in Missouri was pretty excited about book burning too, until he got some negative blowback and decided to call it figurative. https://apnews.com/article/flamethrower-missouri-governor-candidate-violent-6055f2c73bc10c8c58fae1d161c9c91e

There. You are wrong and I am right and banning books is fascist. [/quote]

:lol:  :lol:  :lol: 
So, to recap:
Someone who is NOT an elected Republican was burning cardboard boxes.  He did not burn books and he was not an elected Republican.  So I was right and your were wrong, as expected.

As for your comments about DeSantis, they are illegible.  I have no comment on illegible garbage, except do better.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics