Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm pro-JB and I feel like notactuallygolden is really bad at predicting things even though I enjoy her videos. What's the disconnect here? Is Liman acting unusually for a judge? Is notactuallygolden just not as knowledgeable about federal courts? Is notactuallygolden subconsciously giving best-case-scenarios interpretations of Justin's side because he's more believable/her followers are generally more pro-JB?

I don't know where to get honest answers to these questions, because I feel like the pro-JB side will bite my head off for questioning her, while the pro-Lively side hates Freedman and can't see things objectively either. Any neutral lawyers here who can weigh in?[/quote]

As a long time practicing litigator, it’s Liman.  His rulings aren’t wrong, but they are unusual.  We saw it from the beginning with his refusal to grant assented-to extensions.  [/quote]

[b]I am pretty sure that PP responding above is a Baldoni supporter and not "neutral," which is what you asked for.  I think saying that "The reason I've been calling everything wrong is wholly attributable to a renegade judge (who all but telegraphs some of his opinions in advance), and not to my own bad judgement" is a somewhat convenient take.  I have practiced under judges like Liman before who keep to deadlines, don't extend the parties too much rope to hang themselves on, and are pretty no nonsense.  Liman is pretty on brand for a federal judge in a busy district[/b].[/quote]

Strong disagree and  original poster, google reviews of Louis Liman.  There are sites that allow lawyers to do this and Liman was not well reviewed before he issued a single order in the Lively/Baldoni matter.  Has a reputation with siding with the establishment.[/quote]

[b]Then shouldn't he be siding with Baldoni the harasser here, and not the harassee?  He is a male judge after all.  Conspiracy theories all the way down.[/b][/quote]

Oh look, it’s our favorite “turtles all the way down” rabid Lively supporter trying to pose as someone “neutral.”  How cute.[/quote]

PP who posed question, to be clear, I wrote the bolded parts and I am pro-Lively and not neutral.  But the person who responded to you isn't neutral, either.[/quote]

I'm PP. I think at this point, it's going to be hard to find someone who's neutral, so I'm fine with anyone weighing in. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics