Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm pro-JB and I feel like notactuallygolden is really bad at predicting things even though I enjoy her videos. What's the disconnect here? Is Liman acting unusually for a judge? Is notactuallygolden just not as knowledgeable about federal courts? Is notactuallygolden subconsciously giving best-case-scenarios interpretations of Justin's side because he's more believable/her followers are generally more pro-JB?

I don't know where to get honest answers to these questions, because I feel like the pro-JB side will bite my head off for questioning her, while the pro-Lively side hates Freedman and can't see things objectively either. Any neutral lawyers here who can weigh in?[/quote]

As a long time practicing litigator, it’s Liman.  His rulings aren’t wrong, but they are unusual.  We saw it from the beginning with his refusal to grant assented-to extensions.  [/quote]

I think some of his rulings are unusual, but not others (e.g., the fact NAG left any possibility the NYT suit wouldn't get dismissed was bizarre; whatever the chat boards said, pretty much every lawyer I know thought the suit was borderline frivilous/sanction worthy). I do think she's giving a pro-JB gloss to her interpretations of filings -- unclear if she means to or is just unconsciously biased.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics