Reply to Riverbend FC

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Riverbend FC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why would Loudoun remain connected to NVA now that they have their own GA and Aspire?  Wouldn't they be better suited keeping all of their talent going forward?  Are NVA employees still part of Loudoun staff and therefore the partnership.  How can the pathway to NVA be Loudoun top teams and RBFC Aspire.  Does Loudoun receive kickbacks for allowing NVA to use their fields?  If the partnership broke, how would NVA get fields? Does Loudoun also have MLSN homegrown on the boys side or only NVA? This is all a bit confusing the way it is currently set-up.  [/quote]

Im pretty sure the ED and TD of Loudoun are the ones that run NVA[/quote]

Still boggles the mind that folks don't understand Loudoun/NVA are two separate brands operated by the same people/organization. There is zero daylight between the too. Just look at your registration receipts. [/quote]

Loudoun is becoming more like a feeder club to NVA and customers are catching on.  and NVA can't financially operate on its own so brought Riverbend as another feeder club but more as extra revenue.  Nothing more than that.  [/quote]

It’s kind of comical how confidently people post on here without actually understanding the structure.

Loudoun and NVA are already operated under the same ownership umbrella and share a lot of the same resources. But because both clubs compete in GA, there can’t just be free roster movement between them during the season.

Riverbend is different. It’s being positioned as an [b]Aspire pathway club[/b], which does allow in-season player movement with NVA. It also gives NVA a stronger footprint in a different county and creates a more direct pathway for Fairfax-area players into the system.

This isn’t some overnight “2027 season” play. They’re clearly building a long-term player development pipeline and regional structure that will probably take a few years to fully develop.[/quote]

You lost me at "aspire pathway"  [/quote]

That’s fine, but that’s literally how the structure works.

GA clubs in the same league can’t freely move players back and forth in-season, which is why the Aspire designation matters here. Riverbend gives them a development and movement pathway that Loudoun can’t provide under current GA rules.

You don’t have to like the strategy, but there’s a difference between disagreeing with it and pretending it doesn’t exist.[/quote]

Again I ask, how is Riverbend giving them anything when they have no players? [/quote]

The Riverbend Aspire setup actually creates something that a lot of clubs in the area currently don’t have: a real internal pathway for girls who develop later or want to push to a higher level.

Right now at GFR, the highest level on the girls side is ECNL-RL, which depending on the team is probably comparable to Aspire anyway. But if a player there outgrows that environment and wants GA-level opportunities, the only real option is usually leaving the club and trying out somewhere else.

With Riverbend being connected into the NVA structure through Aspire, their top players will likely have opportunities to train with, guest play, and potentially move into the NVA GA environment over time. That’s a very different model than just being capped at one level inside your own club.

People keep acting like this is only about branding or league labels, but from a player development standpoint, the pathway piece is the real story. And it will take a few seasons to build I think, but who knows.[/quote]

You lost me at RL is basically equivalent to Aspire when, at least right now, the top half of the table in NCLS Division 1 would likely beat 95% of the NoVa Aspire teams, and the top half of the local RL table would probably finish 4th at worst in the region’s GA conference. I know this is a longer term plan but objectively Aspire simply is not there yet. Aspire simply is not the shiny object you think it is.

And GFR already withdrew from a similar arrangement with NVA (when the “pathway” actually went to an ECNL team) bc the opportunities at NVA you are holding out were really more of a mirage, even for much stronger players than R(b)FC is likely to draw.

And if all you’re talking about is a pathway to GA, I think probably at least the top half of the players on GFR’s 2012g, 2013g, and 2014g RL teams could have made a GA roster in the area for next year if that’s what they wanted — no need for a pit stop in Aspire to have a “pathway.” (Probably the older girls also but I don’t know those teams as well.) The area is already over saturated in GA teams relative to available & interested talent. Just look at the drop off after the top three clubs.[/quote]

You’re looking at this entirely through a hyper local NoVA lens when these leagues are way bigger then one conference or one age group.

I never said Aspire today is some elite national platform. The point is Aspire creates structural flexibility and an internal movement pathway that clubs like GFR currently dont have. Those are 2 completley different arguments.

And lets be honest about why GFR pulled away from the NVA pathway arrangement. It wasnt because the pathway was overflowing with success stories. It was because they quickly realized very few if any of their players were realistically going to make the jump into the NVA ECNL enviroment. The speed of play, athleticism and overall level was a much bigger jump from ECNL RL then people on here want to admit.

As for “top half of GFR RL players could make GA rosters tomorrow” maybe some could make lower end GA rosters in an oversaturated market sure. But making a roster and actually impacting games at the higher end GA clubs are two completley different things.

Nobody is saying Riverbend Aspire is magically superior on day one. The point is the long term model: train localy, develop internally, and create a direct bridge into a GA ecosystem without forcing familys to totally restart at another club. Thats what theyre trying to build.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics