Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So, the Dems think it is okay for the FBI and prosecutors to lie and withhold information in order to get a conviction? They think that is justice? Wow.[/quote] No, dear, the Republicans think it's okay to lie and to receive payments from other countries while working as the incoming ("incumbent") NSA. They think it's just darling. - former Republican[/quote] But, it is okay for the Dems to pay for Russian disinformation on a political opponent? Got it.[/quote] That isn't what happened and continuing to mischaracterize it doesn't do you any good service. Maybe ask why Papadopolous, Sessions, Manafort, Page and a whole host of Trump 2016 orbit people were meeting with Russians and then lying about it? What sparked the FBI investigaton? It wasn't Christopher Steele.[/quote] We know. Christopher Steele and his Russian disinformation paid for by HRC and the DNC just gave the FBI and DOJ a way to create a media campaign to promote their false narrative. As for the meetings with "Russians?" I think as time goes on you will discover that these "meetings" weren't what the FBI and media made them out to be. [/quote] But they waited until AFTER the election to begin the media campaign? Okay, makes total sense. [/quote] No, they didn't. NY Times 10/31/16 https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html When this didn't work, they instituted their "insurance policy." [/quote] Again, after the election. It doesn’t make sense. Even if he had been impeached and removed from office, Pence would’ve been the President. Not HRC. [/quote] The insurance policy wasn't just to get rid of Trump. It was also to get Flynn out. Remember, it was Strzok who referenced "the insurance policy" and also insisted the case against Flynn remain open. Not only was Flynn a threat to the Obama policies, he also knew how things worked within the IC. He may just uncover stuff. https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/496170-did-the-fbi-target-michael-flynn-to-protect-obamas-policies-not-national[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics