Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Hudson filed for leave to file a Reply on Fritz's Opposition to the Swift motion for a PO, in part because Fritz brought their own motion to compel on the harassment and damages etc docs.

I think this is saying that Gottlieb added Swift's name to Lively's own Initial Disclosures (which Fritz was using as a reason why her communications must be compelled).  I think Hudson says they only did this after Freedman went to the press and said they got everything they had wanted from Swift, then bringing into question communications Freedman had received from Swift.  Hudson also properly (I think) calls out Fritz's demand for all the harassment/damages docs first, saying they have no duty to produce docs in the order Baldoni wants absent some mutual agreement, which Fritz never asked for.  Nevertheless, Hudson proposes to give Fritz these docs by this Friday, if Fritz gives them all the movie footage which Baldoni's side still has not released -- Hudson specifically says they should get this footage in advance of Lively's deposition.

This is all *a lot* to be putting in front of the judge before a holiday when the dep and amendment is due on Monday.

[url]https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.354.0.pdf[/url][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics