Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are the claims Justin can amend promising? What would he need to do to fix them? I've kinda been tuning out lately because talk has been legal heavy and it's above my understanding. [/quote]

I'm not sure these remaining claims are worth that much tbh, though I defend Lively so may be biased.  There is one claim remaining re Lively/Reynold's alleged tortious (or intentional) interference with Baldoni's contract with WME.  My understanding was that either party could leave that contract at will, and if that's what the contract says if Wayfarer produces it (which they haven't done before), I'm not sure they can recover anything there (though I could be wrong).

The second remaining claim is breach of implied contract of good faith and fair dealing, involving the contract, if it exists, between Lively and Wayfarer.  It's not clear to me under what theory they could recover a lot of money from Lively for that, in part because the movie made such an incredible amount of money.  Also, Wayfarer would need to produce their contract with Lively, which they haven't done yet, so it might not be that helpful for them.  But again, I could be wrong, and I'm biased.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics