Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yeah I’m sure that the reason some Baldoni supporters are shutting their feeds off for a while is all because of Nick Shapiro and has nothing to do with the fact (as they have been saying on Reddit) that they don’t like to hear about all of the losing Freedman is doing. 💯 [/quote] Honestly just worried about the mental health of the Lively supporter who spams this post 24/7, often with strange conspiracy theories. But hey, if you all think that is normal and should be encouraged, continue to have no real life, Lively spammer.[/quote] I mean on the last page alone, the same person posted about Shapiro 4x; twice using the exact same sentence. I don't know why you are under the impression that only Blake posters are "flooding the zone." It's hard to know what else posting the exact same post repeatedly could be characterized as?[/quote] I’m not that poster but pretty sure her point, which remains unrebutted, is that Lively supporters want to ignore Shapiro’s presence on her team and the implications of his role. In any case, she/he posted about this for maybe half an hour. If it goes on for six months, day and night, let me know.[/quote] Wait, did Lively hire a crisis PR firm to retaliate against Baldoni, even though she signed a contract agreeing not to retaliate against him? If so, that would seem really shady. No? [b]I don’t know much about PR, but I thought Baldoni supporters have been mocking Lively for 800 pages now for not being as good at PR as Freedman is. [/b]I wonder what you think she should do in this situation, besides the first thing you guys always suggest which is settle the lawsuit? Seems like she needed more PR help. Is Shapiro more shady than the socials plan we saw from Nathan which had its own section dedicated to targeting feminist messages from Taylor Swift fans? I don’t know PR, so you’d have to get me up to speed on these issues. [/quote] I’ve been on here a lot. I’ve never seen that. It’s curious how every fact is twisted to the extreme. [/quote] Are you serious? You have not seen Baldoni supporters saying that Freedman is much better at the PR angle than Gottlieb? Perhaps we have been in different threads. [/quote] That’s not what you said. You said this [b]I don’t know much about PR, but I thought Baldoni supporters have been mocking Lively for 800 pages now for not being as good at PR as Freedman is[/b] I have not seen 800 pages of Baldoni supporters mocking anyone over PR. Have you? [/quote] I did not mean that this thread was composed of literally 800 pages of Baldoni supporters mocking Lively’s PR. I meant I have seen such mockery consistently across these last 800 pages. But “I have not seen” 800 pages of mockery is not what you said first, either. What you said was: “I’ve been on here a lot. [b]I’ve [u]never[/u] seen that[/b]. It’s curious how every fact is twisted to the extreme.” “I’ve never seen that” doesn’t make sense as a response to “this thread is 800 pages of Baldoni supporters mocking Lively’s PR.” That sounds like you were saying you hadn’t ever seen anyone mock Lively for a bad PR response. Which clearly has happened a lot in this thread. Which is all I was trying to say in support of my statement that maybe Lively hired Shapiro to provide her with the better PR response everyone was saying she needed, sort of like Ellyn Garofalo is currently apparently taking point for Freedman in the CD. Cal. subpoena response where the coordinated legal filings and work with opposing counsel might be outside of his wheelhouse and capacities right now. [/quote] JFC. Exhibit A of why I rarely check this thread anymore. [/quote] It’s the Blake lively PR shills trying to exacerbate and argue and twist over nonsense in an effort to annoy and distract and get everyone to stop discussing how awful she’s acted. It’s a living… [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics