Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trees have to be removed. The planners are already preparing an argument that they are sick and need to come down. Then there are people hear who say they are invasive species. If the current budget for this pool is $12 million, it will dramatically increase once the hydrology is reviewed. If the city builds the pool and folks on Springland get worse flooding, the city is going to be on the hook for additional millions because Springland will be able to argue that changes to Hearst made the situation worse. Thanks Mary Cheh for thinking this through. [/quote] A lot of "ifs" in this statement. The fact is that the water runoff is a significant issue on Springland Lane. The addition of a pool will not impact the mitigation that will need to be implemented. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
