Reply to DCPS students shafted again - sign petition to keep Jelleff field public

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "DCPS students shafted again - sign petition to keep Jelleff field public"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I heard Elisa Silverman say that if maret had sought a 20 year deal, the issue would have had to be voted on by the council. So, instead the parties decided to do a 10 year deal with an option to renew. This totally makes the deal "shady" in that it violated the spirit of the law and good, transparent decision making.  Lawyers or other people who heard her speak, let me know if I misunderstood the facts....[/quote]

Yes, this is the gist of Silverman's point. However, she was clear to point out that Maret has an "easement" to the space rather than the normal "procurement" contract. This is very important, especially as you look at the preference order in which DPR must consider applications for priority use: https://dpr.dc.gov/page/priority-use

I'm guessing this puts Maret in the category of a "partner with written agreement." However, this is an abuse of the partner regulations which are to be governed by law stipulating private public partnerships. It should have applied as a procurement offer to maintain and dole out use of the field.

Here's Maret's 2010 contract with Maret: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ycNlJMWbHeYHXEp05bI--O3JMLhAflAT/view

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics